¿Es YouTube una herramienta fiable para la enseñanza de cura de hernia inguinal asistida por robot? Una revisión crítica de los recursos disponibles / Is YouTube a reliable tool for approaching robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal surgery? A critical review of the available resources

Introducción: La cirugía transabdominal preperitoneal asistida por robot (rTAPP) es una técnica relativamente reciente para el tratamiento de hernia inguinal. Para alcanzar resultados óptimos se deben cumplir las 10 reglas de oro descritas. Los cirujanos en formación suelen revisar vídeos para familiarizarse con nuevas técnicas siendo YouTube una de las plataformas más utilizada. El objetivo de este estudio es realizar una evaluación de los 10 vídeos más vistos en YouTube de reparación de hernia inguinal por rTAPP para determinar si se cumplen las 10 reglas de oro. Métodos: Identificar y evaluar los 10 vídeos con mayor número de visualizaciones relacionados con la rTAPP. Tres Cirujanos con experiencia evaluaron el cumplimiento de las 10 reglas de oro utilizando una escala de Likert. Los datos fueron analizados en Excel (Microsoft) y graficados con Tableau (Tableau Inc). La consistencia entre evaluadores se determinó mediante el alfa de Cronbach, considerándose aceptable un valor > 0,7. Resultados: La evaluación general promedio fue de 3,63 con un rango de 2,6 a 4,9. Las puntuaciones relacionadas con el cumplimiento de las reglas 1, 2, 9, 10 fueron satisfactorias; en cambio, las reglas 3, 4, 5, 7 y 8 fueron débiles, en particular la regla número 7. Se observó consistencia interna entre los evaluadores con un alfa de Cronbach de 0,98. Conclusiones: La falta de cumplimiento con las 10 reglas del oro en la mayoría de los vídeos demuestra que el uso de vídeos (YouTube) no es un adecuado recurso para el aprendizaje de cura de hernia inguinal asistida por robot.(AU)

Introduction: The robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) is a relatively recent technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. To achieve optimal results, the 10 golden rules described must be followed. Surgeons in training often review vídeos to familiarize themselves with new techniques, YouTube being one of the most used platforms. The objective of this study is to carry out an evaluation of the 10 most viewed vídeos on YouTube of inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) to determine if the 10 golden rules are met. Methods: Identify and evaluate the 10 vídeos with the highest number of views related to rTAPP. Three experienced surgeons evaluated compliance with the 10 golden rules using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft) and plotted with Tableau (Tableau Inc.). The consistency between evaluators was determined using Cronbach's alpha, considering a value >0.7 acceptable. Results: The average overall evaluation was 3.63 with a range of 2.6–4.9. The scores related to compliance with the rules 1, 2, 9 and 10 were satisfactory; on the other hand, rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 were weak, particularly rule number 7. Internal consistency was observed between raters with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98.Conclusions: The lack of compliance with the 10 golden rules in most of the vídeos demonstrates that the use of vídeos (YouTube) is not an adequate resource for learning robot-assisted inguinal hernia cure.(AU)

Ampliación vesical pediátrica mediante abordaje robótico puro: ¿por qué no? Primer caso en España / Purely robotic ileocystoplasty in children: why not? First case in Spain

Introducción: Presentamos el primer caso de abordaje robóticopediátrico puro en España. Caso clínico. Varón de 12 años con vejiga neurógena de escasacapacidad y altas presiones sin respuesta al tratamiento conservador,abogando por una ileocistoplastia de aumento. Se lleva a cabo un abordaje robótico puro con 4 puertos robóticos y 2 accesorios, de 380 minutosde duración total sin complicaciones intraoperatorias. Es dado de alta alas 2 semanas previo control cistográfico. Tras 32 meses de seguimientocontinúa continente. Comentarios: La mínima invasión, mayor precisión y ergonomíadel abordaje robótico, hacen de este una opción óptima para técnicasquirúrgicas complejas. Dada la difícil disponibilidad del robot y el escasovolumen pediátrico, resulta un reto su normalización en este campo.Nuestra experiencia coincide con la literatura, mostrando resultados quirúrgicos y estéticos prometedores. Esperamos este reporte contribuya a ladifusión e introducción progresiva de la cirugía robótica en nuestra rutina.(AU)

Introduction: We present the first case of pediatric ileocystoplastyusing a purely robotic approach in Spain. Case report: 12-year-old male with neurogenic bladder of low capacity and high pressures. After failure of conservative treatment, bladderaugmentation with ileum patch was decided upon. Surgery was carriedout using a purely robotic approach with 4 robotic and 2 accessoryports. Surgery duration was 380 minutes in total, without intraoperativecomplications. He was discharged 2 weeks after cystographic control.During 32-months follow-up, he has remained continent. Discussion. The minimal invasion, surgical precision and ergonomics made the robotic approach an optimal option for complex surgicaltechniques. Given the little availability of the robot and the low pediatricvolume, its standardization is a challenge. Our accumulated experienceis consistent with the current literature and shows promising surgical andesthetic results. We hope this case report will contribute to the divulga-tion and progressive introduction of robotic surgery in our daily lives.(AU)

Pentafecta evaluation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by risk group.

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups. METHOD: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP. RESULTS: A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.

OBJETIVO: La prostatectomía radical es la alternativa terapéutica de elección en el cáncer de próstata confinado al órgano. Conforme avanza el desarrollo de los sistemas robóticos, el abordaje con esta tecnología ha comenzado a impactar en los desenlaces funcionales y oncológicos de los pacientes urológicos. El objetivo es reportar el índice de pentafecta en pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRRA) estratificados por grupos de riesgo. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, descriptivo, de 2013 a 2020, que incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a PRAR. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un índice de pentafecta a 12 meses de seguimiento del 35.7% (n = 40). En el subanálisis por grupos de riesgo, al año de seguimiento, se obtuvieron unos índices del 43% (n = 26), el 26% (n = 9) y el 22% (n = 4) en los pacientes de bajo, intermedio y alto riesgo, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía demostró resultados funcionales y oncológicos similares a lo reportado en la literatura con abordaje robótico independientemente del grupo de riesgo del cáncer de próstata.

Telesurgery and telementoring.

Telemedicine has revolutionized the field of surgery, with telemonitoring and telesurgery being 2 of its most promising applications. Telesurgery and telemonitoring are revolutionary applications that have the potential to change the way surgical operations are performed. These applications can allow surgeons to perform operations, enable surgeons to perform operations by assisting or supervising others through mentoring from a different location (telementoring). Despite the potential benefits of telemedicine and telementoring, there are still challenges that must be overcome before they can be widely used in clinical practice. For example, latency in data transmission can be a problem in telemedicine, as even a small delay in data transmission can affect the accuracy of the operation. Additionally, a sophisticated and expensive technological infrastructure is required, which can limit their use in some clinical settings. Although we need to work on its development technologically, ethically and legally, it is a promising tool.

Is YouTube a reliable tool for approaching robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal surgery? A critical review of the available resources.

INTRODUCTION: The robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) is a relatively recent technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia. To achieve optimal results, the 10 golden rules described must be followed. Surgeons in training often review videos to familiarize themselves with new techniques, YouTube being one of the most used platforms. The objective of this study is to carry out an evaluation of the 10 most viewed videos on YouTube of inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal approach (rTAPP) to determine if the 10 golden rules are met. METHODS: Identify and evaluate the 10 videos with the highest number of views related to rTAPP. Three experienced Surgeons evaluated compliance with the 10 golden rules using a Likert scale. Data were analyzed in Excel (Microsoft) and plotted with Tableau (Tableau Inc). The consistency between evaluators was determined using Cronbach's alpha, considering a value >0.7 acceptable. RESULTS: The average overall evaluation was 3.63 with a range of 2.6 to 4.9. The scores related to compliance with the rules 1, 2, 9, 10 were satisfactory; on the other hand, rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 were weak, particularly rule number 7. Internal consistency was observed between raters with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of compliance with the 10 golden rules in most of the videos demonstrates that the use of videos (YouTube) is not an adequate resource for learning robot-assisted inguinal hernia cure.

DATA GOVERNANCE in digital surgery.

Technological and computer advances have led to a "new era" of Surgery called Digital Surgery. In it, the management of information is the key. The development of Artificial Intelligence requires "Big Data" to create its algorithms. The use of digital technology for the systematic capture of data from the surgical process raises ethical issues of privacy, property, and consent. The use of these out-of-control data creates uncertainty and can be a source of mistrust and refusal by surgeons to allow its use, requiring a framework for the correct management of them. This paper exposes the current situation of Data Governance in Digital Surgery, the challenges posed and the lines of action necessary to resolve the areas of uncertainty that have arisen in the process, in which the surgeon must play a relevant role.

Laparoscopic TAPP to treat inguinal hernia. Is the robot preferable? A review and cohort-study on anatomical landmarks of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal groin hernia repair (r-TAPP).

In this review, the advantages of the robotic platform in rTAPP are presented and discussed. Against the background of the unchanged results of conventional TAPP for decades (approx. 10% chronic pain and approx. 3.5% recurrence), a new anatomy-guided concept for endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with the robot is presented. The focus is on the identification of Hesselbach's ligament. The current results give hope that the results of TAPP can be improved by rTAPP and that rTAPP is not just a more expensive version of conventional TAPP. To support the rationale presented here, we analyzed 132 video recordings of rTAPP's for the anatomical structures depicted therein. The main finding is, that in all cases (132/132 or 100%) Hesselbach's ligament was present and following its lateral continuity with the ileopubic tract offered a safe framework to develop all the critical anatomical structures for clearing the myopectineal orifice, repair the posterior wall of the groin and perform a flawless mesh fixation. Future studies are needed to integrate all the resources of the robotic platform into an rTAPP concept that will lead out of the stalemate of the indisputably high rate of chronic pain and recurrences.

Implementación de un programa de cirugía bariátrica sin ingreso hospitalario y seguimiento con plataforma de telemonitorización / Implementation of a same-day discharge bariatric surgery program and follow-up with a telemonitoring platform

Introducción: Existe experiencia previa en programas de cirugía bariátrica ambulatoria en pacientes seleccionados, que reportan buenos resultados tras gastrectomía vertical. Estudios recientes demuestran que la cirugía ambulatoria también es factible y segura en el bypass gástrico en Y de Roux. El objetivo del presente trabajo es describir y analizar los resultados de nuestra experiencia inicial tras la implementación de un programa de cirugía bariátrica sin ingreso hospitalario, con la utilización del sistema de telemonitorización. Métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo con 14 pacientes consecutivos seleccionados, intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica primaria (gastrectomía vertical o bypass gástrico en Y de Roux) en un único centro, desde abril de 2021 hasta febrero 2023, con seguimiento en domicilio mediante la plataforma de telemonitorización REVITA® (HI Iberia, S.A.) y la unidad de hospitalización a domicilio. Resultados: Desde abril de 2021 a febrero 2023 fueron seleccionados para este programa 14 pacientes, lo cual significa el 7,3% del total de 191 pacientes intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica durante este periodo. Llegaron a completar el circuito 10 de los 14 pacientes seleccionados (71,4%). Cuatro de los 10 pacientes que completaron el circuito consultaron a urgencias en las primeras 24h (40%). No hubo complicaciones graves, reingresos, ni reintervenciones propias de la cirugía bariátrica. Se ha estimado un ahorro de 762€ por cada paciente que completa el circuito. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica sin ingreso hospitalario es factible y segura en pacientes seleccionados usando una plataforma de telemonitorización y con el apoyo de una unidad de hospitalización a domicilio. (AU)

Introduction: Some groups have initiated outpatient bariatric surgery programs in selected patients, publishing good results after sleeve gastrectomy. Recent studies show that outpatient surgery is also feasible and safe in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The aim of this paper is to describe and analyze the results of our initial experience after the implementation of a same-day discharge bariatric surgery program using a telemonitoring system. Methods: We have completed a prospective, observational study with 14 consecutive, selected patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) at a single center from April 2021 to February 2023, with home follow-up using the REVITA® telemonitoring platform (HI Iberia, S.A.) and the home hospitalization unit. Results: From April 2021 to February 2023, 14 patients were selected for this program, which meant 7.3% of the total of 191 patients who underwent bariatric surgery during this period. Ten out of the 14 patients selected completed the circuit (71.4%), 4 of whom consulted the emergency department within the first 24h (40%). There were no serious complications, readmissions or re-operations typical of bariatric surgery. The estimated savings per patient who completed the circuit was €762. Conclusion: Bariatric surgery without hospital admission is feasible and safe in selected patients using a telemonitoring platform and with the support of a home hospitalization unit. (AU)

Is laparoscopic TAPP the preferred approach for the treatment of inguinal hernia? Technique, indications and future perspectives.

The repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in General Surgery units. The laparoscopic approach for these hernias will be clearly considered as the gold standard, based on its advantages over the open approach. There are no clear advantages of the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) over the totally preperitoneal approach (TEP), although it has been shown to be more reproducible, presenting a shorter learning curve, although it presents more possibilities of developing trocar site hernias. Laparoscopic TAPP could be superior to TEP in the following indications: incarcerated hernias, emergencies, previous preperitoneal surgery, previous Pfanestiel-type incision, recurrent hernias, inguinoscrotal hernias and obese, being also a better alternative for females. Robotic TAPP is a safe approach with similar results to laparoscopy; however, it is related to an increase in costs and operating time. The value of this technology for the repair of complex hernias (multiple recurrences, inguino-scrotal or after previous preperitoneal surgery) remains to be determined, since they represent a certain challenge for the conventional laparoscopic approach. On the other hand, robotic repair of inguinal hernias may be a way to reduce the learning curve before addressing complex ventral hernias. Finally, artificial intelligence applied to the laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia will undoubtedly have a significant impact in the future especially to determine the best the indications for this approach, on the performance of a safer technique, on the correct selection of meshes and fixation mechanisms, and on learning curve.

Cirugía robótica hepática: una nueva realidad. Análisis descriptivo de 220 casos de cirugía hepática mínimamente invasiva en 182 pacientes / Robotic liver surgery: A new reality. Descriptive analysis of 220 cases of minimally invasive liver surgery in 182 patients

Introducción El nivel de recomendación del abordaje robótico en la cirugía hepática es controvertido. Se realiza un análisis descriptivo, retrospectivo yunicéntrico de los resultados a corto plazo de la cirugía hepática robótica y laparoscópica en un mismo periodo.MétodosAnálisis descriptivo del abordaje robótico y laparoscópico sobre 220 resecciones en 182 pacientes sometidos a cirugía hepática mínimamente invasiva.ResultadosEntre abril de 2018 y junio de 2022 se realizaron 92 resecciones hepáticas robóticas (RHR) en 83 pacientes y 128 laparoscópicas (RHL) en 99 pacientes. Se observaron más resecciones mayores (p<0,001) y más resecciones múltiples (p=0,002) en el grupo CHL. El porcentaje de resecciones anatómicas fue similar (RHR: 64,1 vs. RHL: 56,3%). En el grupo CHL el tiempo medio operatorio fue de 212min (DE: 52,1), las pérdidas hemáticas de 276,5ml (100-1.000) y la tasa de conversión del 12,1%. La estancia media hospitalaria fue de 5,7 días (DE: 4,9), la morbilidad fue del 27,3%, con un 2% de mortalidad. En el grupo CHR el tiempo medio operatorio fue de 217min (DE: 53,6), las pérdidas hemáticas fueron de 169,5ml (100-900) y la tasa de conversión del 2,5%. La estancia media hospitalaria fue de 4,1 días (DE: 2,1) y la morbilidad fue del 15%, con mortalidad nula.ConclusiónLa cirugía mínimamente invasiva hepática es una técnica segura y reproducible. La CHR permite realizar resecciones hepáticas con seguridad y parece ser una técnica no inferior a la CHL, pero para determinar el abordaje mínimamente invasivo de elección en cirugía hepática se requieren estudios aleatorizados. (AU)

Introduction The level of recommendation of the robotic approach in liver surgery is controversial. The objective of the study is to carry out a single-center retrospective descriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach in liver surgery during the same period.MethodsDescriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach on 220 resections in 182 patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery.ResultsBetween April 2018 and June 2022, a total of 92 robotic liver resections (RLR) were performed in 83 patients and 128 laparoscopic (LLR) in 99 patients. The LLR group showed a higher proportion of major surgery (P<.001) and multiple resections (P=.002). The two groups were similar in anatomical resections (RLR 64.1% vs. LLR 56.3%). In the LLS group, the average operating time was 212min (SD 52.1). Blood loss was 276.5ml (100-1000) and conversion 12.1%. Mean hospital stay was 5.7 (SD 4.9) days. Morbidity was 27.3% and 2% mortality. In the RLS group, the mean operative time was 217min (SD 53.6), blood loss 169.5ml (100.900), and conversion 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 4.1 (SD 2.1) days. Morbidity was 15%, with no mortality.ConclusionMinimally invasive liver surgery is a safe technique, and in particular, RLS allows liver resections to be performed safely and reproducibly; it appears to be a non-inferior technique to LLS, but randomized studies are needed to determine the minimally invasive approach of choice in liver surgery. (AU)

Pancreatectomía corporocaudal laparoscópica y robótica, de elección y de futuro / Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: The choice and the future

Introducción La pancreatectomía distal (PD) mínimamente invasiva (MIS) está actualmente bien establecida, ya sea mediante técnica laparoscópica (PDL) o robótica (PDR).MétodosDe 83 PD realizadas entre enero del 2018 y marzo del 2022, se realizaron 57 casos (68,7%) mediante MIS, 35 PDL y 22 PDR (da Vinci Xi). Se evalúa la experiencia de ambos procedimientos y el valor del abordaje robótico. Se analizan en detalle los casos de conversión.ResultadosEl tiempo quirúrgico medio en las PDL y PDR fue de 201,2 (DE 47,8) y 247,54 (DE 35,8) min, (p=0,486). No se observaron diferencias en estancia hospitalaria ni en tasa de conversión, 6 (5-34) vs. 5,6 (5-22) días y 4 (11,4%) vs. 3 (13,6%) casos, respectivamente, (p=0.126). La tasa de reingresos fue de 3/35 (11,4%) y 6/22 (27,3%) casos, PDL vs. PDR respectivamente, (p=0.126).No existieron diferencias en morbilidad (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III) entre ambos grupos. La mortalidad fue de un caso en el grupo robótico (un paciente con conversión precoz por afectación vascular). La tasa de resecciones R0 fue mayor en el grupo robótico (77,1% vs. 90,9%) alcanzando la significación estadística, p=0,04.ConclusionesLa PDMIS es un procedimiento seguro y factible en pacientes seleccionados. Una planificación quirúrgica y la implementación escalonada basada en la experiencia previa ayudan a afrontar procedimientos técnicamente exigentes. Se sugiere que la PDR podría ser el abordaje de elección en la pancreatectomía corporocaudal, no siendo inferior a la PDL. (AU)

Introduction Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently well established as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure, using either a laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approach.MethodsOut of 83 DP performed between January 2018 and March 2022, 57 cases (68.7%) were performed using MIS: 35 LDP and 22 RDP (da Vinci Xi). We have assessed the experience with the 2techniques and analyzed the value of the robotic approach. Cases of conversion have been examined in detail.ResultsThe mean operative times for LDP and RDP were 201.2 (SD 47.8) and 247.54 (SD 35.8)min, respectively (p=0,486). No differences were observed in length of hospital stay or conversion rate: 6 (5–34) vs. 5.6 (5–22) days, and 4 (11.4%) vs. 3 (13.6%) cases, respectively (p=0.126). The readmission rate was 3/35 patients (11.4%) treated with LDP and 6/22 (27.3%) cases of RDP (p=0.126).There were no differences in morbidity (Dindo-Clavien≥III) between the 2groups. Mortality was one case in the robotic group (a patient with early conversion due to vascular involvement). The rate of R0 resection was greater and statistically significant in the RDP group (77.1% vs. 90.9%) (P=,04).ConclusionsMinimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. Surgical planning and stepwise implementation based on prior experience help surgeons successfully perform technically demanding procedures. RDP could be the approach of choice in distal pancreatectomy, and it is not inferior to LDP. (AU)

Transferencia de habilidades prácticas desde el laboratorio a cirugía in vivo utilizando el sistema robótico Avatera: Estudio experimental / Transfer of acquired practical skills from dry lab into live surgery using the Avatera robotic system: an experimental study

Objetivo Evaluar la transferencia de habilidades adquiridas en el laboratorio a un entorno experimental real para realizar cirugía robótica. Material y métodos Se utilizó un modelo experimental in vivo. Seis residentes y fellows de urología; dos R2 sin exposición previa a cirugía laparoscópica (Grupo 1), dos R4 con exposición intermedia (Grupo 2) y dos fellows formados en cirugía laparoscópica (Grupo 3) realizaron reimplantes ureterales distales, pieloplastia, y nefrectomía radical en tres cerdos hembra. Previamente a realizar los procedimientos, cada participante completó entre 10 y 14 h de formación en cirugía robótica en laboratorio hasta adquirir habilidades para realizar maniobras quirúrgicas básicas (sutura, corte y paso de agujas). Las variables analizadas fueron completar o no con éxito los procedimientos, el tiempo de consola y el tiempo para realizar las maniobras solicitadas y. presencia de complicaciones. Resultados Los tres grupos completaron con éxito todos los procedimientos excepto la pieloplastia, que no la completó el Grupo 1 por sangrado de la vena renal. El Grupo 3 logró un tiempo de consola más corto para todos los procedimientos y para los pasos quirúrgicos por separado, seguido por el Grupo 2. El grupo más lento para completar los procedimientos y los pasos fue el Grupo 1. Conclusiones A pesar de que es necesaria evidencia clínica al respecto, nuestros resultados sugieren que los procedimientos urológicos con asistencia robótica y los pasos más difíciles técnicamente podrían realizarse de manera segura y efectiva después de un entrenamiento adecuado en el laboratorio bajo la supervisión de un mentor. (AU)

Objective To evaluate the transfer of the practical skills of robot-assisted surgery acquired in the dry-lab into a real live experimental setting for performing upper and lower urinary tract surgeries. Material and methods An in vivo experimental study design was utilized. Six urology trainees and fellows; two 2nd year trainees with no previous exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 1), two 4th year residents with medium exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 2) and two fellows trained to perform laparoscopic surgeries (Group 3) performed ureteral reimplantation into the bladder, pyeloplasty, and radical nephrectomy on three female pigs under general anesthesia. Prior to performing the requested procedures, each participant completed 10-14 hours dry-lab robotic training acquiring skills in basic surgical tasks, such as suturing, cutting and needle passage. The recorded variables were the successful completion of the procedures, the console time, and the time to perform different steps and major complications. Results All procedures were completed successfully by all groups except the pyeloplasty by Group 1 which was complicated by bleeding from the renal vein, and the procedure was abandoned. Group 3 achieved shorter console time for all successfully completed procedures and for separate surgical steps compared to all groups, followed by Group 2. The slowest group for all procedures and steps analyzed was Group 3. Conclusions Although further clinical evidence is needed, the robotic-assisted urological procedures and the most challenging steps could be performed safely and effectively after proper training in the dry lab under mentor supervision according to our study. (AU)

Implementation of a same-day discharge bariatric surgery program and follow-up with a telemonitoring platform.

INTRODUCTION: Some groups have initiated outpatient bariatric surgery programs in selected patients, publishing good results after sleeve gastrectomy. Recent studies show that outpatient surgery is also feasible and safe in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The aim of this paper is to describe and analyze the results of our initial experience after the implementation of a same-day discharge bariatric surgery program using a telemonitoring system. METHODS: We have completed a prospective, observational study with 14 consecutive, selected patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) at a single center from April 2021 to February 2023, with home follow-up using the REVITA® telemonitoring platform (HI Iberia, S.A.) and the Home Hospitalization Unit. RESULTS: From April 2021 to February 2023, 14 patients were selected for this program, which meant 7.3% of the total of 191 patients who underwent bariatric surgery during this period. Ten out of the 14 patients selected completed the circuit (71.4%), 4 of whom consulted the emergency department within the first 24 h (40%). There were no serious complications, readmissions or re-operations typical of bariatric surgery. The estimated savings per patient who completed the circuit was 762. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery without hospital admission is feasible and safe in selected patients using a telemonitoring platform and with the support of a home hospitalization unit.

Transfer of acquired practical skills from dry lab into live surgery using the avatera robotic system: An experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the transfer of the practical skills of robot-assisted surgery acquired in the dry-lab into a real live experimental setting for performing upper and lower urinary tract surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An in vivo experimental study design was utilized. Six urology trainees and fellows; two 2nd year trainees with no previous exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 1), two 4th year residents with medium exposure to laparoscopic surgery (Group 2) and two fellows trained to perform laparoscopic surgeries (Group 3) performed ureteral reimplantation into the bladder, pyeloplasty, and radical nephrectomy on three female pigs under general anesthesia. Prior to performing the requested procedures, each participant completed 10-14 h dry-lab robotic training acquiring skills in basic surgical tasks, such as suturing, cutting and needle passage. The recorded variables were the successful completion of the procedures, the console time, and the time to perform different steps and major complications. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully by all groups except the pyeloplasty by group 1 which was complicated by bleeding from the renal vein, and the procedure was abandoned. Group 3 achieved shorter console time for all successfully completed procedures and for separate surgical steps compared to all groups, followed by Group 2. The slowest group for all procedures and steps analyzed was Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Although further clinical evidence is needed, the robotic-assisted urological procedures and the most challenging steps could be performed safely and effectively after proper training in the dry lab under mentor supervision according to our study.

Abordaje robótico de la exenteración pélvica masculina. Sistematización de la técnica / Robotic pelvic exenteration in males: Systematization of the technique

La exenteración pélvica masculina es un procedimiento complejo con elevada morbilidad. En casos muy seleccionados, el abordaje robótico puede facilitar la disección y reducir la morbilidad gracias a la mejor visión y versatilidad de movimientos. Describimos la técnica de exenteración pélvica robótica sistematizada con DaVinci Xi y sus variantes en varones, tras haber intervenido tres casos en nuestro Centro. Describimos la colocación de trocares, material necesario, localización de minilaparotomía y secuencia de los procedimientos a realizar paso a paso. Distinguimos tres supuestos: exenteración pélvica total con amputación de recto, colostomía y urostomía; exenteración pélvica con preservación de esfínter, anastomosis colo-rectal/anal y urostomía; exenteración pélvica con amputación de recto, colostomía y reconstrucción de tracto urinario. (AU)

Male pelvic exenteration is a challenging procedure with high morbidity. In very selected cases robotic approach could make dissection easier and decrease morbidity due to a better view and higher range of movements. In this paper we describe port placement, instruments, minilaparotomy location and sequence of procedures step by step. We differentiate three situations: total pelvic exenteration with abdominoperineal resection, colostomy and urostomy; pelvic exenteration with colo-rectal/anal anastomosis and urostomy; pelvic exenteration with abdominoperineal resection, colostomy and urinary tract reconstruction. (AU)

Robotic pelvic exenteration in males: systematization of the technique.

Male pelvic exenteration is a challenging procedure with high morbidity. In very selected cases, the robotic approach could make dissection easier and decrease morbidity due to the better vision provided and higher range of movements. In this paper, we describe port placement, instruments, minilaparotomy location, and the stepwise sequence of these procedures. We address 3 different situations: total pelvic exenteration with abdominoperineal resection, colostomy and urostomy; pelvic exenteration with colorectal/anal anastomosis and urostomy; and pelvic exenteration with abdominoperineal resection, colostomy and urinary tract reconstruction.

Ensayo clínico multicéntrico para la resección de pólipos rectales mediante un nuevo dispositivo de acceso transanal híbrido laparoendoscópico / Multicenter clinical trial for the resection of rectal polyps using a new laparoendoscopic hybrid transanal access device

Introducción: Los pólipos complejos requieren el uso de técnicas endoscópicas avanzadas o la cirugía mínimamente invasiva para su abordaje. En los pólipos rectales es de especial relevancia llegar a un consenso de cuál es el mejor abordaje de estos para evitar infratratamientos o sobretratamientos que incrementen una morbimortalidad innecesaria. Métodos: Se describe un ensayo clínico piloto con un producto sanitario de primer uso en humanos multicéntrico y prospectivo. Se plantea la hipótesis que UNI-VEC® facilita la cirugía laparoendoscópica transanal para la extirpación de tumores rectales precoces. El objetivo principal es evaluar que es seguro y cumple los requisitos funcionales establecidos. Los secundarios son evaluar resultados, complicaciones y nivel de satisfacción.Resultados: Se reclutaron 16 pacientes en 12 meses con un seguimiento mínimo de dos meses. El tamaño medio ha sido de 3,4 cm, siendo el pólipo mayor de 6 cm. Respecto a la localización, la media se encontraba a 6,6 cm del margen anal. Se realizó resección endoscópica mucosa (REM) (6,3%), disección submucosa endoscópica (DSE) (43,8%), resección espesor completo (REC) (6,3%) y transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) (43,8%). El tiempo medio fueron 73,25 min; 56,3% utiliza una cámara de 30̊ y 43,8% el endoscopio flexible como instrumento de visión. El 56,3% son lesiones benignas y 43,8% malignas. En 87,5% se consigue resección completa. En cuanto a las complicaciones, se presenta sangrado leve (Clavien I) en 25, 6,3 y 21,4% a las 24 h, 48 h y siete días, respectivamente. La continencia se valora según la Escala de Wexner. A los siete días, 60% presentan continencia perfecta, 26,7% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los 30 días, 66,7% continencia perfecta, 20% IF leve y 13,3% IF moderada. A los dos meses se revisan cuatro de los pacientes que a los 30 días presentaban un Wexner superior al preoperatorio y se demuestra continencia perfecta en 25% de los pacientes, 50% leve y 25% moderada. (AU)

Introduction: Complex polyps require the use of advanced endoscopic techniques or minimally invasive surgery for their approach. In rectal polyps it is of special relevance to reach a consensus on the best approach to avoid under- or overtreatment that increases unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Methods: We describe a prospective, multicenter, pilot clinical trial with a first-in-human medical device. It is hypothesized that UNI-VEC® facilitates transanal laparoendoscopic surgery for the removal of early rectal tumors. The primary objective is to evaluate that it is safe and meets the established functional requirements. Secondary objectives are to evaluate results, complications and level of satisfaction. Results: Sixteen patients were recruited in 12 months with a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The mean size was 3.4 cm with the largest polyp being 6 cm. Regarding location, the mean was 6.6 cm from the anal margin. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (6.3%), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (43.8%), REC (6.3%) and TAMIS (43.8%) were performed. The mean time was 73.25 min. The 56.3% used a 30° camera and 43.8% used the flexible endoscope as a viewing instrument. The 56.3% were benign lesions and 43.8% malignant. Complete resection is achieved in 87.5%. Regarding complications, mild bleeding (Clavien I) occurred in 25%, 6.3% and 21.4% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, respectively. Continence was assessed according to the Wexner scale. At 7 days, 60% showed perfect continence, 26.7% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 30 days, 66.7% had perfect continence, 20% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 2 months, 4 patients were reviewed who at 30 days had a Wexner's degree higher than preoperative and perfect continence was demonstrated in 25% of the patients, 50% mild and 25% moderate. (AU)

Robotic liver surgery: A new reality. Descriptive analysis of 220 cases of minimally invasive liver surgery in 182 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The level of recommendation of the robotic approach in liver surgery is controversial. The objective of the study is to carry out a single-center retrospective descriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach in liver surgery during the same period. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of the short-term results of the robotic and laparoscopic approach on 220 resections in 182 patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery. RESULTS: Between April 2018 and June 2022, a total of 92 robotic liver resections (RLR) were performed in 83 patients and 128 laparoscopic (LLR) in 99 patients. The LLR group showed a higher proportion of major surgery (P < .001) and multiple resections (P = .002). The two groups were similar in anatomical resections (RLR 64.1% vs. LLR 56.3%). In the LLS group, the average operating time was 212 min (SD 52.1). Blood loss was 276.5 mL (100-1000) and conversion 12.1%. Mean hospital stay was 5.7 (SD 4.9) days. Morbidity was 27.3% and 2% mortality. In the RLS group, the mean operative time was 217 min (SD 53.6), blood loss 169.5 mL (100.900), and conversion 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 4.1 (SD 2.1) days. Morbidity was 15%, with no mortality. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive liver surgery is a safe technique, and in particular, RLS allows liver resections to be performed safely and reproducibly; it appears to be a non-inferior technique to LLS, but randomized studies are needed to determine the minimally invasive approach of choice in liver surgery.

Laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: the choice and the future.

INTRODUCTION: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is currently well established as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure, using either a laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approach. METHODS: Out of 83 DP performed between January 2018 and March 2022, 57 cases (68.7%) were performed using MIS: 35 LDP and 22 RDP (da Vinci Xi). We have assessed the experience with the two techniques and analyzed the value of the robotic approach. Cases of conversion have been examined in detail. RESULTS: The mean operative times for LDP and RDP were 201.2 (SD 47.8) and 247.54 (SD 35.8) minutes, respectively (P = NS). No differences were observed in length of hospital stay or conversion rate: 6 (5-34) vs. 5.6 (5-22) days, and 4 (11.4%) vs. 3 (13.6%) cases, respectively (P = NS). The readmission rate was 3/35 patients (11.4%) treated with LDP and 6/22 (27.3%) cases of RDP (P = NS). There were no differences in morbidity (Dindo-Clavien ≥ III) between the two groups. Mortality was one case in the robotic group (a patient with early conversion due to vascular involvement). The rate of R0 resection was greater and statistically significant in the RDP group (77.1% vs. 90.9%) (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is a safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. Surgical planning and stepwise implementation based on prior experience help surgeons successfully perform technically demanding procedures. RDP could be the approach of choice in distal pancreatectomy, and it is not inferior to LDP.

Multicenter clinical trial for the resection of rectal polyps using a new laparoendoscopic hybrid transanal access device.

INTRODUCTION: Complex polyps require the use of advanced endoscopic techniques or minimally invasive surgery for their approach. In rectal polyps it is of special relevance to reach a consensus on the best approach to avoid under- or overtreatment that increases unnecessary morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We describe a prospective, multicenter, pilot clinical trial with a first-in-human medical device. It is hypothesized that UNI-VEC® facilitates transanal laparoendoscopic surgery for the removal of early rectal tumors. The primary objective is to evaluate that it is safe and meets the established functional requirements. Secondary objectives are to evaluate results, complications and level of satisfaction. RESULTS: 16 patients were recruited in 12 months with a minimum follow-up of 2 months. The mean size was 3.4 cm with the largest polyp being 6 cm. Regarding location, the mean was 6.6 cm from the anal margin. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) (6.3%), Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ESD (43.8%), REC (6.3%) and TAMIS (43.8%) were performed. The mean time was 73.25 min. The 56.3% used a 30° camera and 43.8% used the flexible endoscope as a viewing instrument. The 56.3% were benign lesions and 43.8% malignant. Complete resection is achieved in 87.5%. Regarding complications, mild bleeding (Clavien I) occurred in 25%, 6.3% and 21.4% at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days respectively. Continence was assessed according to the Wexner scale. At 7 days, 60% showed perfect continence, 26.7% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 30 days, 66.7% had perfect continence, 20% mild FI and 13.3% moderate FI. At 2 months, 4 patients were reviewed who at 30 days had a Wexner's degree higher than preoperative and perfect continence was demonstrated in 25% of the patients, 50% mild and 25% moderate. In no case did rectal perforation or major complications requiring urgent reintervention occur. As for the level of reproducibility, safety, level of satisfaction with the device and evaluation of the blister, the evaluation on a scale of 0-10 (9.43, 9.71, 9.29 and 9.50 respectively). All the investigators have previous experience with transanal devices. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of UNI-VEC® for the treatment of rectal lesions. It will facilitate the implementation of hybrid procedures that seek to solve the limitations of pure endoscopic techniques by allowing the concomitant use of conventional laparoscopic and robotic instrumentation with the flexible endoscope.